Major Considerations When Reviewing Medical Claims for Insurance

by | Published on Sep 10, 2014 | Medical Record Review

When a personal injury/workers’ compensation claim is made, an insurance adjuster would review the applicant’s file to determine eligibility. There are certain key factors that would be taken into account in this regard.

Medical records and medical bills: These are among the first items the insurance adjuster would evaluate to arrive at the value of the claim. Usually, all treatments and services do not enjoy equal status. A lower value may be placed on a chiropractic service compared to that provided by say, a cardiologist. The adjuster’s effort will be to identify information that can justify the value of a claim via a comprehensive medical record review.

Liability: In a personal injury case, the insurance adjuster will be looking for proof that the insured is responsible for the claimant’s injuries. If no such evidence is available, the adjuster can always make a claim that the injured or a third party may be partially to blame.

The jury’s mindset: The insurance adjuster would also take into consideration whether the jury would be sympathetic to the injured person. On the other hand, the jury’s opinion of the insured person will also be reflected on. Other aspects that could have a negative impact on the insured are whether he/she was inebriated or under the influence of drugs at the time of the incident; whether he/she has a criminal history/bad litigation history; whether he/she has been earlier involved in some case.

Lost Income and Projected Income Loss in the Future: Another important consideration would be, the time the injured person lost from work on account of the injuries. The income and benefits lost during that period as well as the expected financial loss the injured may incur in the future will also be reviewed.

History of Medical Claims: A person who has multiple previous injury claims will surely be under the shadow of suspicion. Such claims are very likely to be reviewed as potentially fraudulent.

When the injury was first reported: An injury that is not reported immediately will also be considered skeptically. The injured not mentioning the reason for refusing treatment at the scene of the incident (if it so happened), not mentioning the accident/event to the first doctor he/she visits after the incident, etc. can serve to lower the value of the claim.

Discover our medical record review solutions and partner with us for your next case.

Related Posts

Best Practices for Conducting Thorough Legal Medical Record Reviews

Best Practices for Conducting Thorough Legal Medical Record Reviews

According to a John Hopkins Study, more than a quarter million deaths occur as a result of medical errors, making it the third leading cause of death in the United States, after heart disease and cancer. Regardless of whether the requirement is for malpractice cases,...

Understanding Slip and Fall Workers’ Compensation

Understanding Slip and Fall Workers’ Compensation

Slip and fall workers’ compensation benefits may be available to workers who sustain a slip and fall injury while doing a work-related task. Such injuries are among the most common workplace injuries and often entails considerable medical expenses and lost wages....

Understanding Narrative Summaries in Medical Record Review

Understanding Narrative Summaries in Medical Record Review

According to a 2023 report by the National Institutes of Health (NIH), around 80% of a patient’s healthcare information is disorganized, making it challenging for non-medical professionals to navigate the records. A well-crafted narrative summary is what makes medical...